While the deployment and interaction patterns may look similar on the surface, Theseus agents represent a fundamental paradigm shift from traditional smart contracts.
Many people believe Ethereum smart contracts are autonomous because they can call other contracts or execute complex logic. This is incorrect.
Smart contracts are purely reactive. They cannot initiate any action without an Externally Owned Account (EOA) with a private key sending them a transaction first.
Note on Automation: Services like Chainlink Keepers or Gelato are off-chain bots with private keys that monitor and trigger contracts. The contract itself is still reactive—it just outsources the triggering to a third party.
Like a vending machine: Contains logic and can dispense items, but someone must press the buttons. It cannot decide to operate on its own, check inventory, or restock itself.
Like an autonomous shopkeeper: Can wake up, check inventory, make decisions about restocking, interact with suppliers, and manage the store without anyone telling it what to do.
Passive code that waits to be called. Deterministic, rigid logic with no ability to initiate actions.
Autonomous entities with true agency. Can think, decide, and act independently without human control.
Notice how Ethereum smart contracts require external EOAs (with private keys) to initiate everything, while Theseus agents can wake up and act autonomously.

Top: Ethereum requires a developer with a private key to trigger every action.Bottom: Theseus agents can initiate actions and run inference autonomously.
Deploying a Theseus agent feels familiar to web2 developers and resembles smart contract deployment, but with crucial additions that enable true autonomy.
Ethereum smart contracts are reactive programs with conditional logic that must be externally triggered. Theseus agents are autonomous digital entities that can think, plan, and act without human intervention. The deployment process may look similar, but what you get is fundamentally different: not a passive contract, but an active, intelligent agent with real autonomy.
The technical differences between Theseus agents and Ethereum smart contracts are significant, but the implications go far deeper. This isn't just about making contracts "smarter"—it's about unlocking an entirely new design space for on-chain applications that were previously impossible or impractical.
Over the last decade, many efforts improved smart contract platforms: SVM, MoveVM, Polkadot, eWASM. These provided cleaner programming models or different languages, but all maintained the same fundamental design constraint: deterministic, replicated execution across all nodes. This is excellent for security and verifiability, but limits the complexity of programs that can run economically on-chain.
Theseus takes a different approach. By using tensor commitments for verifiable inference, one node performs heavy computation while others verify it. This makes complex, intelligent applications economically feasible on-chain while preserving verifiability.
Public ownership you can verify. Removed treasurers from "who owns what."
Public program behavior you can verify. Removed judges from "what happens next."
Public agent decisions you can verify. Removes hosts and operators from "what kind of decision will an intelligent entity make?"
If Ethereum's ~$500B market cap is tied to the value of its apps, then making those apps dramatically more capable should substantially increase value captured by the base chain. When applications become more powerful and cheaper to operate, more activity can live on-chain.
Before Bitcoin, there was Hashcash. It implemented proof-of-work but holds almost no value compared to Bitcoin. By the same logic, the separate market caps of "Ethereum" and "agents" already exist—unifying them with tensor commitments suggests one of the largest TAMs in crypto, where the whole is worth far more than the sum of the parts.